Dissemination plan:
My project has an artistic purpose among other objectives, so the idea is to expose in art galleries, the piece to be able to see how people interact with it and to be able to improve or replicate different pieces with the same objective, to visualize the invisible. The first exhibition will be in the gallery Crac art , the second week of July, as a guest to the exhibition of sound art artist Joan Villaperros. This exhibition will be disseminated by different social networks and will have enough assistance of people interested in the art.

The idea is to be prototypes of various ways to visualize the sea, with the Chandli Io plate with liquid. The manufacturing processes are very simple so they could be produced in any fablab with a cnc Routerm and a millimachine. As I said, this project is intended as an artistic installation and not as a mass marketing object. It would be mass production and limited. For this, I have thought of generating a brand identity with a concept of art / science, and its seriousness through a web page and social networks of related themes. For example, the cymatics page would be a good platform for disclosure. This would be a personal initiative, as a product of author.

Intellectual property:
Normally for my artwork I use creative commons as a license. In this case I will also use this type of license, choosing the mode Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). Which is the medium restrictive of our six main licenses. With creative commons you are free to:Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material. I have chosen this modality because I would like to generate a line of interactive sound equipment with the body, but I do not want it to be commercialized before I make its disclosure.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) Terms:

Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Free Cultural Works:

The other opcion a think about its a Attribution 4.0 International,with free cultural licence, because it´s an art project and you can be “approved for free cultural works” under this definition. (These licenses are sometimes referred to as “free licenses.”) To help show more clearly what the different CC licenses let people do, CC marks the most permissive of its licenses as “Approved for Free Cultural Works.” And you can use this graphic, who means that a license is not approved for free cultural works.

When you apply these licenses to material you create, it meets the Freedom Defined definition of a “Free Cultural Work.” Free cultural works are the ones that can be most readily used, shared, and remixed by others, and go furthest toward creating a commons of freely reusable materials. But “Cultural works” that should be under a free content license rather than a free software license. (Free software licenses often include terms designed specifically for functional works that free content licenses don’t contain, such as source code requirements and patent grants.) Just if is not software should be considered to be a “cultural work”, and if for this I decide not use this opcion, because my project have a code incluid in.